Share:

US 24 W over IS 29

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.10694, -94.56925
39°06'25" N, 94°34'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:US 24 W over IS 29
Structure number:6505
Location:S 33 T 50 N R 33 W
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:144.0 ft. [43.9 m]
Total length:287.1 ft. [87.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:45.9 ft. [14.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:61.0 ft. [18.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Skew angle:39°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1953
Year reconstructed:2003
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Low slump Concrete [4]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:2,987 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:82.2 tons [74.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:73.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$2,635,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201573.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory2987
September 201373.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2987
September 201173.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8394
December 200973.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8480
January 200873.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood9569
November 200573.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood7526
January 200571.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood7633
September 200373.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood7702
October 200247.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor18088
October 200147.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor17751