Share:

CLIFF DR W over RP US24 TO IS29N

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.11694, -94.56448
39°07'01" N, 94°33'52" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CLIFF DR W over RP US24 TO IS29N
Structure number:6507
Location:S 33 T 50 N R 33 W
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Total length:54.1 ft. [16.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:15.1 ft. [4.6 m]
Skew angle:23°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1953
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Frame [07]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:190 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:54.5 tons [49.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:28.7 tons [26.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:58.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$183,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201558.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory190
September 201458.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory190
September 201358.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory200
September 201253.4Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory5500
September 201170.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSatisfactory5500
December 200972.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory5500
January 200874.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory5500
November 200586.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5500
October 200384.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory11000
October 200182.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory12987