NINTH ST W over IS 70


+39.10325, -94.57221
39°06'12" N, 94°34'20" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:NINTH ST W over IS 70
Structure number:6609
Old structure number:L 938 1 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 5 T 49 N R 33 W
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:82.0 ft. [25.0 m]
Total length:264.1 ft. [80.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:56.4 ft. [17.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1958
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,348 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:89.1 tons [81.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:48.5 tons [44.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:40.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$2,206,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201540.5Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousSatisfactory3348
September 201440.5Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousSatisfactory3348
September 201340.6Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousSatisfactory3116
September 201227.0Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousSatisfactory7058
September 201127.0Structurally deficientSeriousSeriousSatisfactory7074
February 201063.3Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory7621
January 200863.2Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory8036
November 200575.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory8547
September 200375.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9388
October 200175.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9212
200068.5Not applicable---29200
September 199876.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9212
September 199776.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory9212
September 199676.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory6580
September 199576.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory6580
October 199476.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory6390
November 199376.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory6390
October 199276.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory6390
November 199176.7Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory6390