OR 55 S over UP RR


+38.28347, -90.40325
38°17'00" N, 90°24'12" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:OR 55 S over UP RR
Structure number:708
Old structure number:A 955 1 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 420 T 41 N R 6 E
Purpose:Carries highway over railroad
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Total length:160.1 ft. [48.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:23.6 ft. [7.2 m]
Skew angle:24°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:2,318 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Underclearances appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:31.7 tons [28.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:19.8 tons [18.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:58.6
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$688,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201458.6Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory2318
November 201258.6Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory2434
January 201255.3Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory11000
January 201056.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory11000
January 200856.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory11000
December 200556.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory11000
February 200452.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory11000
November 200153.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory11000
January 200165.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory629
January 200065.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory629
November 199865.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory629
January 199865.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory629
January 199765.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood370
January 199665.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good370
September 199468.1Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good350
January 199468.1Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good350
January 199369.1Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good350
December 199169.1Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good350