Share:

IS 435 N over UP RR

Map 

Coordinates:
+39.05309, -94.49731
39°03'11" N, 94°29'50" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:IS 435 N over UP RR
Structure number:748
Old structure number:A 995R 3 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 19 T 49 N R 32 W
Purpose:Carries highway over railroad
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Interstate (Urban) [11]
Length of largest span:65.0 ft. [19.8 m]
Total length:169.0 ft. [51.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:46.6 ft. [14.2 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Skew angle:16°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1964
Year reconstructed:1983
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:46,123 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:11% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:68.3 tons [62.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:40.6 tons [36.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:76.2
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$981,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201576.2Functionally obsoleteGoodExcellentGood46123
September 201376.2Functionally obsoleteGoodExcellentGood46123
September 201176.3Functionally obsoleteGoodExcellentGood44247
December 200976.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentVery Good43093
December 200776.7Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentVery Good38717
November 200576.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodExcellentVery Good43840
February 200576.4Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentVery Good43492
March 200441.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory43449
December 200241.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory43576
October 200140.1Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory58379
September 199933.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory56423
September 199855.1Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory56423
September 199767.6Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory56423
October 199668.2Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory51914
October 199570.5Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory51914
October 199470.6Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory50500
November 199370.6Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory50610
November 199270.6Functionally obsoleteFairGoodSatisfactory50610
December 199170.8Not deficientFairGoodSatisfactory48851