Share:

MARKET ST E over RP PINE ST TO IS64E, RP

Map 

Coordinates:
+38.63000, -90.20833
38°37'48" N, 90°12'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:MARKET ST E over RP PINE ST TO IS64E, RP
Structure number:799
Old structure number:A1500R3 4 (from 1992 edition)
Location:S 23 T 45 N R 7 E
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:73.5 ft. [22.4 m]
Total length:345.2 ft. [105.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:82.0 ft. [25.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:93.8 ft. [28.6 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:6
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Box Beam or girders - Single or Spread [06]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:14,221 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:60.4 tons [54.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:58.6
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$3,249,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
July 201558.6Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory14221
August 201458.7Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory13727
August 201356.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory13894
August 201175.6Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory14306
August 200976.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory14598
August 200779.9Not deficientSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory15212
August 200579.9Not deficientSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory15346
August 200379.8Not deficientSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory15705
October 200191.2Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory15412
September 200076.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory149848
September 199976.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory149848
September 199876.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory149848
October 199776.0Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood149848
October 199676.4Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood119878
October 199578.9Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood119878
September 199481.2Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood119878
September 199281.6Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood114996
October 199181.9Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood111000