MO 156 E over S FABIUS RVR
Map
Coordinates:
+39.98812, -91.9913939°59'17" N, 91°59'29" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | MO 156 E over S FABIUS RVR |
| Structure number: | 8918 |
| Old structure number: | S 952 1 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | S 22 T 60 N R 10 W |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
| Length of largest span: | 81.0 ft. [24.7 m] |
| Total length: | 166.0 ft. [50.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.9 ft. [7.6 m] |
| Skew angle: | 37° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1963 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 370 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 25% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 16.5 tons [15.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 8.8 tons [8.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 34.4 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $935,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 432 [as of 1997] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 18.8 tons [17.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 8.9 tons [8.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 32.8 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $422,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 500 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 18.8 tons [17.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 8.9 tons [8.1 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 31.2 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $404,000 |