MO 111 S over TARKIO RVR
Map
Coordinates:
+40.19036, -95.4238640°11'25" N, 95°25'26" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | MO 111 S over TARKIO RVR |
| Structure number: | 8992 |
| Old structure number: | T 104 1 (from 1992 edition) |
| Location: | S 9 T 62 N R 40 W |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 100.7 ft. [30.7 m] |
| Total length: | 180.1 ft. [54.9 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 21.3 ft. [6.5 m] |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1934 |
| Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
| Design load: | M 9 / H 10 [1] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 502 [as of 2008] |
| Truck traffic: | 40% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 19.8 tons [18.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 17.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,111,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 119 [as of 1997] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 21.8 tons [19.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 30.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $561,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 401 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 21.8 tons [19.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 33.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $380,000 |