+32.28159, -90.17895
32°16'54" N, 90°10'44" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:US 80 over PEARL RIVER
Structure number:210008002504640
Location:0.1 MI E US 51
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:120.1 ft. [36.6 m]
Total length:1170.0 ft. [356.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1938
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:13,000 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:65.1 tons [59.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:38.9 tons [35.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:76.2
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]
Estimated cost of work:$999,999,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 201576.2Not deficientFairFairFair13000
July 201376.2Not deficientFairFairFair13000
January 201476.2Not deficientFairFairFair13000
August 201172.7Not deficientFairFairFair25000
July 200972.7Not deficientFairFairFair25000
July 200754.4Structurally deficientFairPoorSatisfactory25000
July 200557.6Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory25000
July 200357.6Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory25000
June 200157.6Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory25000
August 200043.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory21000
August 199943.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory21000
August 199843.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryPoorSatisfactory21000
January 199774.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory19000
December 199452.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory13000
April 199353.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory12500
June 199159.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory17310