US 80 over CREEK


+32.35137, -89.33852
32°21'05" N, 89°20'19" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:US 80 over CREEK
Structure number:210008006209700
Location:1.0 MI W SR 489
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Total length:98.1 ft. [29.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:23.3 ft. [7.1 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1935
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:3,400 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:53.4 tons [48.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.0 tons [29.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:68.7
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$921,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201568.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodVery Good3400
January 201366.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory3400
December 201066.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory3900
November 200867.1Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory3900
November 200667.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory3800
January 200570.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory3200
February 200370.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory3200
January 200166.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory5700
February 199966.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory5700
April 199766.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory5700
April 199553.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory5500
October 199153.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory5090
December 198957.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory2540