+33.89010, -88.95446
33°53'24" N, 88°57'16" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:CR 100 over TRIB OF HOULKA CK
Structure number:SA0900000000100
Location:SEC 2 T14S R 3E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Total length:57.1 ft. [17.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.3 ft. [7.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.6 ft. [7.5 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:2008
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:50 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:64.9 tons [59.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:38.8 tons [35.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:99.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$156,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201599.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good50
October 201399.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good50
October 201178.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good50
September 200978.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good50
November 200878.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good50
September 200725.4Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairImminent Failure50
November 200629.4Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairCritical50
September 200529.4Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor50
September 200429.4Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor50
December 200329.4Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairPoor50
November 200132.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairFair50
January 200142.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood50
November 199945.5Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood50
February 199945.5Structurally deficientGoodGoodGood50
December 199745.5Structurally deficientGoodGoodGood50
December 199547.6Structurally deficientVery GoodGoodGood50