Share:

CR 89 over UNNAMED BRANCH

Map 

Coordinates:
+33.81953, -88.97916
33°49'10" N, 88°58'45" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CR 89 over UNNAMED BRANCH
Structure number:SA0900000000116
Location:SEC 34 T14S R 3E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Total length:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:2007
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: October 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:60 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:60.3 tons [54.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:99.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$95,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
October 201599.0Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good60
October 201399.0Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good60
October 201178.5Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good60
September 200978.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good60
October 200778.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good60
November 200636.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairImminent Failure60
September 200536.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairCritical60
September 200440.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairCritical60
December 200340.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairCritical60
November 200140.0Structurally deficientSatisfactoryFairCritical60
January 200140.0Structurally deficientGoodFairSerious60
November 199940.0Structurally deficientGoodFairSerious60
February 199937.0Structurally deficientPoorFairSerious60
December 199739.0Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor60
December 199539.0Structurally deficientFairSatisfactoryPoor60