+32.30847, -90.19794
32°18'30" N, 90°11'53" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:SA2500000000110
Location:SEC 4 T 5N R 1E
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Total length:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.4 ft. [12.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:59.1 ft. [18.0 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1920
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:14,000 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:5.9 tons [5.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:4.5 tons [4.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:35.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$222,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201635.5Structurally deficientGoodFairPoor14000
February 201535.5Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryPoor14000
February 201435.5Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryPoor14000
February 201335.5Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryPoor14000
February 201235.5Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryPoor14000
February 201135.5Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryPoor14000
February 201035.5Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor14000
January 200931.9Structurally deficientFairFairPoor14000
November 200731.9Structurally deficientFairFairPoor14000
January 200731.9Structurally deficientFairFairPoor14000
December 200531.9Structurally deficientFairFairPoor14000
December 200431.9Structurally deficientFairFairPoor14000
February 200431.9Structurally deficientFairFairPoor14000
February 200234.4Structurally deficientFairFairPoor14000
December 200035.3Structurally deficientFairFairPoor11000
February 200035.4Structurally deficientFairFairPoor10790
February 199935.4Structurally deficientFairFairPoor10790
March 199835.4Structurally deficientFairFairPoor10790
April 199635.4Structurally deficientFairFairPoor10790