+32.28975, -90.17944
32°17'23" N, 90°10'46" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:SA2500000000128
Location:SEC_10_T 5N_R 1E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:191.0 ft. [58.2 m]
Total length:1010.5 ft. [308.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.5 ft. [8.7 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1925
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Arch - Deck [11]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:8,400 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:59.3 tons [53.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:29.8 tons [27.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:75.4
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$584,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201575.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8400
September 201375.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8400
October 201179.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood8400
February 201179.5Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodVery Good8400
February 201079.5Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentExcellent8400
November 200779.5Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentExcellent8400
November 200579.5Functionally obsoleteExcellentExcellentExcellent8400
February 200479.5Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent8400
February 20022.0Structurally deficientSerious-Critical8400
December 20002.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousCritical8400
February 20002.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousCritical8400
February 19992.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousCritical8400
March 19982.0Structurally deficientPoorSeriousCritical8400
April 19964.0Structurally deficientFairSeriousCritical8400