Share:

TV ROAD over CANEY CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.28349, -90.27465
32°17'01" N, 90°16'29" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:TV ROAD over CANEY CREEK
Structure number:SA2500000000133
Location:SEC 11 T 5N R 1W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Total length:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:31.2 ft. [9.5 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2010
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:380 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Excellent [9 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:88.8 tons [80.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:53.1 tons [48.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:100.0

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 2015100.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent380
February 2013100.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent380
February 2011100.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent380
February 201028.3Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor380
January 200928.3Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor380
November 200728.3Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor380
January 200728.3Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor380
November 200528.3Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor380
February 200464.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory380
January 200263.0Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory270
February 200055.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory2600
March 199855.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory2600
April 199655.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory2600