+32.26913, -90.25914
32°16'09" N, 90°15'33" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:SA2500000000135
Location:SEC 13 T 5N R 1W
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Total length:68.9 ft. [21.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.6 ft. [13.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:51.2 ft. [15.6 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1966
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:11,000 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:5.9 tons [5.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:4.5 tons [4.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:7.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$299,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 20167.0Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor11000
February 201567.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair11000
February 201467.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair11000
February 201345.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair11000
February 201145.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair11000
February 201045.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair11000
November 200745.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair11000
December 200545.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair11000
February 200456.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory11000
January 200256.6Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory11000
February 200056.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory12360
March 199856.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory12360
April 199656.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory12360