Share:

HANGING MOSS RD over TRIB HANGING MOSS CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.38079, -90.17966
32°22'51" N, 90°10'47" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:HANGING MOSS RD over TRIB HANGING MOSS CREEK
Structure number:SA2500000000205
Location:SEC 10 T 6N R 1E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Total length:68.9 ft. [21.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:26.6 ft. [8.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1987
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Bridge closed to all traffic [K]
Average daily traffic:12,000 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:5.9 tons [5.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:4.5 tons [4.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:7.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$175,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 20157.0Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactorySerious12000
September 20147.0Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor8800
February 20147.0Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor8800
February 20137.0Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor8800
February 20127.0Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor8800
February 20117.0Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor8800
February 20107.0Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor8800
January 20097.0Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor8800
November 200746.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair8800
November 200546.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair8600
February 200446.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair8600
January 200246.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair8600
February 200058.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory4080
March 199858.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory4080
April 199658.4Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory4080