+32.34366, -90.16886
32°20'37" N, 90°10'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:SA2500000000232
Location:SEC 23 T 6N R 1E
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.4 ft. [12.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:50.2 ft. [15.3 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1961
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:360 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:5.9 tons [5.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:4.5 tons [4.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:40.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$298,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201640.9Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor360
February 201540.9Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor360
February 201440.9Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor360
February 201340.9Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor360
February 201240.9Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor360
February 201140.9Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor360
February 201040.9Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor360
January 200940.9Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor360
November 200740.9Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor360
January 200740.9Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor360
December 200540.9Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor360
December 200440.9Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor360
February 200440.9Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor360
February 200240.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor360
December 200040.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor350
February 200040.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor350
February 199940.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor350
March 199840.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor350
April 199640.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor350