+32.34062, -90.16450
32°20'26" N, 90°09'52" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:SA2500000000236
Location:SEC 26 T 6N R 1E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Total length:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:37.4 ft. [11.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Skew angle:60°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1991
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Main span material:Wood or timber [7]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:240 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:8.6 tons [7.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:5.5 tons [5.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:38.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$185,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201638.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair240
February 201538.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair240
February 201438.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair240
February 201338.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair240
February 201238.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair240
February 201138.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodFair240
February 201038.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodFair240
January 200939.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor240
November 200739.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor240
January 200739.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor240
December 200539.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor240
December 200436.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor240
February 200436.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodPoor240
February 200236.9Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodFair240
December 200045.3Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory220
February 200045.3Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory220
February 199945.3Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory220
March 199846.3Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory220
April 199646.3Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood220