+32.31562, -90.23369
32°18'56" N, 90°14'01" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:SA2500000000245
Location:SEC 31 T 6N R 1E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Total length:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:41.7 ft. [12.7 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2001
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Wood or timber [7]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:520 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:11.8 tons [10.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:8.0 tons [7.3 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:55.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$158,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201655.0Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood520
February 201555.0Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood520
February 201455.0Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood520
February 201355.0Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood520
February 201255.0Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood520
February 201143.7Structurally deficientGoodGoodFair520
February 201043.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodFair520
January 200943.4Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodFair1500
November 200743.4Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodFair1500
January 200743.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodFair1460
November 200543.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodFair1460
January 200543.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodFair1460
February 200443.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodFair1460
February 200240.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodFair1460
December 200039.5Structurally deficientFairFairFair1450
February 200039.5Structurally deficientFairFairFair1450
February 199939.5Structurally deficientFairFairFair1450
March 199839.5Structurally deficientFairFairSatisfactory1450
April 199651.5Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory1450