+32.31970, -90.23366
32°19'11" N, 90°14'01" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:SA2500000000247
Location:SEC 31 T 6N R 1E
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Total length:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1985
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Wood or timber [7]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:4,000 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:11.8 tons [10.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:6.7 tons [6.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:13.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$156,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201613.9Structurally deficientPoorGoodFair4000
February 201513.9Structurally deficientPoorGoodFair4000
February 201431.4Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory4000
February 201331.4Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory4000
February 201231.4Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory4000
February 201132.7Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory4000
February 201032.7Structurally deficientSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory4000
January 200921.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair4000
November 200721.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair4000
January 200721.2Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair3700
November 200532.8Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3700
January 200531.8Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3700
February 200431.8Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory3700
February 200232.8Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3700
December 200033.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3300
February 200033.0Structurally deficientGoodGoodGood3300
February 199933.0Structurally deficientGoodGoodGood3300
March 199833.0Structurally deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3300
April 199634.6Structurally deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3300