+32.32676, -90.18718
32°19'36" N, 90°11'14" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:SA2500000000260
Location:SEC_33_T 6N_R 1E
Purpose:Carries highway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:88.9 ft. [27.1 m]
Total length:938.0 ft. [285.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:56.1 ft. [17.1 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1940
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:21
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:28,000 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:43.0 tons [39.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:24.0 tons [21.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:50.6
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$2,529,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201550.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairGood28000
September 201450.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair28000
October 201350.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair28000
October 201250.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair28000
December 201139.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair28000
February 201139.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodFair28000
February 201039.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair28000
January 200939.8Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair28000
November 200739.8Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair28000
November 200541.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair22000
February 200441.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair22000
February 200241.3Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryFair22000
February 200040.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair24000
March 199840.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair24000
April 199640.8Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodFair24000