+32.32139, -90.25274
32°19'17" N, 90°15'10" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:SA2500000000270
Location:SEC 36 T 6N R 1W
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Total length:57.1 ft. [17.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:31.2 ft. [9.5 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2010
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,600 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:102.0 tons [92.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:60.9 tons [55.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:78.1
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$175,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201578.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7600
February 201378.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7600
February 201178.1Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good7600
February 20102.0Structurally deficientCriticalCriticalImminent Failure7600
November 200756.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory7600
November 200556.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory7400
February 200456.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory7400
February 200256.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodSatisfactory7400
February 200056.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood6400
March 199856.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood6400
April 199656.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodVery GoodGood6400