Share:

ST ANDREWS over LARGE STREAM

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.39389, -90.10472
32°23'38" N, 90°06'17" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:ST ANDREWS over LARGE STREAM
Structure number:SA2500000000273
Location:SEC 4 T 6N R 2E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Total length:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:31.2 ft. [9.5 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:2002
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:240 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:57.4 tons [52.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:34.2 tons [31.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:99.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$127,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201699.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good240
February 201499.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good240
February 201279.5Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good240
February 201079.5Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent240
November 200779.5Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent240
November 200579.5Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent240
February 200479.5Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent240
March 200287.8Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent240
February 200087.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory216
March 199887.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory216
April 199687.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory216