+32.38432, -90.12309
32°23'04" N, 90°07'23" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:SA2500000000280
Location:SEC 8 T 6N R 2E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Total length:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:22.3 ft. [6.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:23.6 ft. [7.2 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1993
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Wood or timber [7]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:5,400 [as of 2014]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:18.4 tons [16.7 metric tons]
Inventory rating:13.3 tons [12.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:45.2
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$127,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201645.2Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5400
February 201545.2Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5400
February 201445.2Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5400
February 201245.2Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5400
February 201050.4Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood5400
November 200750.4Structurally deficientGoodVery GoodGood5400
November 200550.4Structurally deficientGoodVery GoodGood5400
February 200446.2Structurally deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood5400
January 200246.2Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood5400
February 200049.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good1440
March 199849.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good1440
April 199649.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good1440