+32.37613, -90.11622
32°22'34" N, 90°06'58" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:SA2500000000281
Location:SEC_ 8_T 6N_R 2E
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:44.0 ft. [13.4 m]
Total length:88.9 ft. [27.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.7 ft. [11.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:44.9 ft. [13.7 m]
Skew angle:20°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1965
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,300 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:8% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:31.7 tons [28.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:24.8 tons [22.5 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:77.6
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$585,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201577.6Not deficientGoodGoodFair2300
September 201377.6Not deficientGoodGoodFair2300
October 201177.6Not deficientGoodGoodFair2300
February 201088.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood2300
November 200788.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood2300
November 200588.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good2300
February 200488.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good2300
February 200288.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good2300
February 200088.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good2268
March 199888.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good2268
April 199688.6Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good2268