+32.37054, -90.11006
32°22'14" N, 90°06'36" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:SA2500000000284
Location:SEC 17 T 6N R 2E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Total length:55.1 ft. [16.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:34.5 ft. [10.5 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1995
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Wood or timber [7]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:40 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:13.2 tons [12.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:8.8 tons [8.0 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:51.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$261,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201651.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40
February 201551.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40
February 201451.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40
February 201351.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40
February 201251.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40
February 201151.0Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory40
February 201051.0Structurally deficientGoodGoodGood40
January 200951.0Structurally deficientGoodGoodGood40
November 200751.0Structurally deficientGoodGoodGood40
January 200751.0Structurally deficientGoodGoodGood40
November 200551.0Structurally deficientGoodGoodGood40
December 200451.0Structurally deficientGoodGoodGood40
February 200451.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood40
February 200251.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood40
December 200048.4Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good180
February 200048.4Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good180
February 199948.4Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good180
March 199851.2Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good180
April 199661.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good180