Share:

LANG MILL ROAD over HONTOKALO CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+32.46712, -89.38651
32°28'02" N, 89°23'11" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LANG MILL ROAD over HONTOKALO CREEK
Structure number:SA6200000000092
Location:SEC 9 T 7N R 9E
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Total length:154.9 ft. [47.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:26.6 ft. [8.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:2006
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:5
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Channel beam [22]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: December 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:50 [as of 2012]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:82.7 tons [75.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:49.5 tons [45.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:100.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$500,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
December 2015100.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood50
December 2013100.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood50
December 2011100.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good50
December 2009100.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent50
January 2008100.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent50
December 2006100.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent50
September 200535.9Structurally deficientPoorFairSerious50
September 200435.9Structurally deficientPoorFairSerious50
December 200335.9Structurally deficientPoorFairSerious50
December 200134.9Structurally deficientFairFairImminent Failure50
December 200037.9Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySerious50
December 199938.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor50
December 199838.9Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryPoor50
November 199756.9Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory50
December 199557.1Not deficientGoodGoodGood50