Share:

SR1115 over DOUBLE BRANCH

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.67720, -81.75444
35°40'38" N, 81°45'16" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SR1115 over DOUBLE BRANCH
Structure number:000000000230126
Location:.3 MI.S.JCT.SR1116
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:34.1 ft. [10.4 m]
Total length:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: January 2016 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:350 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:6% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:1.0 tons [0.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:1.0 tons [0.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:18.7

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
January 201618.7Structurally deficientGoodPoorPoor350
January 201420.0Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactoryPoor350
January 201219.8Structurally deficientGoodFairPoor390
January 201019.9Structurally deficientGoodFairPoor370
November 200743.4Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory700
February 200643.4Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory700
October 200343.4Structurally deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory700
June 200243.4Structurally deficientGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory700
September 200043.4Structurally deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory700
February 199843.4Structurally deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory700
April 199046.1Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodSatisfactory500