+35.78999, -79.10874
35°47'24" N, 79°06'31" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:000000000370037
Old structure number:000000000037037 (from 1992 edition)
Location:0.6 MI.S. JCT. US64
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02]
Length of largest span:86.0 ft. [26.2 m]
Total length:141.1 ft. [43.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:37.4 ft. [11.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:40.4 ft. [12.3 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2005
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 9 / H 10 [1]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete continuous [6]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Integral Concrete (separate non-modified layer of concrete added to structural deck) [2]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2016 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,500 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:14% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:80.9 tons [73.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:47.9 tons [43.5 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:99.3

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
February 201699.3Not deficientGoodGoodGood7500
February 201499.3Not deficientGoodGoodGood7500
February 201299.4Not deficientGoodGoodGood6000
February 201099.4Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good6500
February 200899.5Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good5500
December 200599.5Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent5500
March 200476.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory10000
April 200276.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory10000
May 200076.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory10000
March 199863.3Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory10500
March 199674.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory9000
March 199472.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory8900
March 199268.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory10600
March 199071.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood7100