SR1169 over P.EAGLE FORK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.01476, -83.6308635°00'53" N, 83°37'51" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | SR1169 over P.EAGLE FORK CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000000000430060 |
| Location: | 0.15 MI.E.JCT.SR1172 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 28.9 ft. [8.8 m] |
| Total length: | 30.8 ft. [9.4 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Skew angle: | 30° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1966 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 530 [as of 2005] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 7.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $170,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 140 [as of 1995] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 20.8 tons [18.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 11.9 tons [10.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 42.8 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $171,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 20 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 6% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 20.8 tons [18.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 13.9 tons [12.6 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 49.0 |