PARK ROAD over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK

Map 

Facts 

Name:	PARK ROAD over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
Structure number:	000000001190020
Location:	0.8 MI.S.WOODLAWN RD.
Purpose:	Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:	40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Total length:	120.1 ft. [36.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:	58.1 ft. [17.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:	70.2 ft. [21.4 m]
Owner:	City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:	1956
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Concrete [1]
Main spans design:	Tee beam [04]
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:	Bituminous [6]

2010 Inspection 

Status:	Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:	27,000 [as of 1994]
Truck traffic:	6% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:	Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:	33.7 tons [30.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	18.8 tons [17.1 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	44.5
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:	$1,106,000

2000 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	27,000 [as of 1994]
Truck traffic:	6% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:	Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:	58.4 tons [53.1 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	63.0
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:	$846,000

1992 Inspection 

Status:	Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:	24,900 [as of 1990]
Truck traffic:	7% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:	Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:	Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Channel protection:	Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:	Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6]
Operating rating:	73.3 tons [66.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:	42.6 tons [38.7 metric tons]
Evaluation:	Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:	63.6
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:	$691,000

Comments