SR4873 over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.21377, -80.8358335°12'50" N, 80°50'09" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | SR4873 over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000000001190164 |
| Location: | 0.13 MI.W.JCT.SR3816 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
| Total length: | 105.0 ft. [32.0 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 67.9 ft. [20.7 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 82.4 ft. [25.1 m] |
| Skew angle: | 4° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1948 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 13.5 / HS 15 [3] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 15,900 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 45.5 tons [41.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 27.7 tons [25.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 70.7 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,140,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 15,900 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 45.5 tons [41.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 27.7 tons [25.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 70.7 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $870,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 18,500 [as of 1988] |
| Truck traffic: | 12% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 69.5 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $711,000 |