TUCKASEEGEE ROAD over STEWART CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.23674, -80.8665535°14'12" N, 80°51'60" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | TUCKASEEGEE ROAD over STEWART CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000000001190385 |
| Location: | 0.1 MI E JCT GESCO ST. |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
| Total length: | 33.1 ft. [10.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 56.1 ft. [17.1 m] |
| Skew angle: | 25° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1950 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1980 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 13,100 [as of 1994] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 53.5 tons [48.6 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 31.7 tons [28.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 77.1 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $342,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 13,100 [as of 1994] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 60.4 tons [54.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 64.1 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $296,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 10,000 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 49.5 tons [45.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 31.7 tons [28.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 74.8 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $248,000 |