EAST BOULEVARD over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.19646, -80.8385835°11'47" N, 80°50'19" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | EAST BOULEVARD over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK |
| Structure number: | 000000001190397 |
| Location: | 0.4 MI E JCT SCOTT AVE. |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Urban) [19] |
| Length of largest span: | 21.0 ft. [6.4 m] |
| Total length: | 65.9 ft. [20.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 60.0 ft. [18.3 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1930 |
| Year reconstructed: | 1952 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 17,000 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 38.6 tons [35.1 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 22.8 tons [20.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 48.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $581,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 17,000 [as of 1991] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U] |
| Operating rating: | 44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 54.1 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $468,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 17,000 [as of 1988] |
| Truck traffic: | 7% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 44.6 tons [40.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 27.7 tons [25.2 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 55.2 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $387,000 |