Share:

18TH STREET over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.23386, -80.82202
35°14'02" N, 80°49'19" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:18TH STREET over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
Structure number:000000001190410
Location:200 FT.S.JCT.DAVIDSON ST.
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Total length:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:32.8 ft. [10.0 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1960
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Corrugated Steel [6]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:500 [as of 1991]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge with "unknown" foundation that has not been evaluated for scour. [U]
Operating rating:12.0 tons [10.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:7.0 tons [6.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:33.8

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201433.8Structurally deficientPoorPoorFair500
May 201233.8Structurally deficientFairPoorFair500
May 201058.2Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood500
August 200858.2Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood500
June 200667.6Not deficientGoodGoodGood500
April 200467.6Not deficientGoodGoodGood500
July 200267.6Not deficientGoodGoodGood500
July 200067.6Not deficientGoodGoodGood500
April 199863.8Not deficientGoodGoodGood500
May 199045.8Structurally deficientSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair500