Share:

WELLINGFORD ROAD over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.26101, -80.79016
35°15'40" N, 80°47'25" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:WELLINGFORD ROAD over LITTLE SUGAR CREEK
Structure number:000000001190423
Location:0.15 MI.N.JCT.TRYON ST.
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:24.9 ft. [7.6 m]
Total length:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.6 ft. [7.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.2 ft. [8.6 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1955
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Corrugated Steel [6]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:2,900 [as of 1993]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Operating rating:33.9 tons [30.8 metric tons]
Inventory rating:18.9 tons [17.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:49.1

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
May 201449.1Functionally obsoleteGoodFairFair2900
May 201250.6Functionally obsoleteGoodFairFair2900
May 201059.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood2900
August 200859.4Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood2900
May 200662.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood2900
April 200462.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood2900
July 200262.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood2900
October 200062.5Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood2900
April 199863.5Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood2900
May 199053.9Not deficientGoodGoodSatisfactory500