Share:

SARDIS ROAD over MCALPINE CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+35.13736, -80.76806
35°08'14" N, 80°46'05" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:SARDIS ROAD over MCALPINE CREEK
Structure number:000000001190434
Location:0.3 MI.N.JCT.SARDIS RD.
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:76.1 ft. [23.2 m]
Total length:143.1 ft. [43.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:47.6 ft. [14.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:60.7 ft. [18.5 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1979
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:21,000 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:7% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:74.8 tons [68.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:44.9 tons [40.8 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:70.9

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201470.9Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood21000
July 201273.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16200
July 201073.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood16200
August 200873.2Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryGoodGood16200
May 200673.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good16200
April 200473.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good16200
July 200273.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good16200
September 200073.2Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good16200
March 199870.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16200
June 199079.4Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood15000