COUNTY HIGHWAY over PEARL CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+42.51384, -97.3675742°30'50" N, 97°22'03" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | COUNTY HIGHWAY over PEARL CREEK |
| Structure number: | C001411313 |
| Location: | 5E 4.3N OF MAGNET |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
| Total length: | 50.9 ft. [15.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 17.7 ft. [5.4 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 17.7 ft. [5.4 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1913 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
| Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 15 [as of 2003] |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Operating rating: | 9.9 tons [9.0 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 5.9 tons [5.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 38.3 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $121,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 15 [as of 1997] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 7.9 tons [7.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 3.0 tons [2.7 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 30.0 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $121,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 15 [as of 1990] |
| Deck condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 8.2 tons [7.5 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 3.7 tons [3.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Structurally deficient [1] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 19.4 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $100,000 |