Share:

COUNTY HIGHWAY 10 over M FK MAPLE CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+41.70204, -97.07893
41°42'07" N, 97°04'44" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:COUNTY HIGHWAY 10 over M FK MAPLE CREEK
Structure number:C001901945
Location:2E 1.2S OF CLARKSON
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:62.0 ft. [18.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:15.7 ft. [4.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.4 ft. [5.0 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1935
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Wood or Timber [7]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:50 [as of 2003]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Operating rating:12.0 tons [10.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:7.0 tons [6.4 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:26.6
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201526.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair50
September 201326.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairFair50
October 201138.6Not deficientSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory50
October 200938.6Not deficientSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory50
May 200738.6Not deficientSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory50
December 200425.2Structurally deficientFairPoorFair50
November 200237.6Not deficientFairFairFair50
October 200037.6Not deficientFairFairFair50
October 199843.5Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory50
October 199643.5Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory50
October 199444.4Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory50
October 199242.5Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory50
November 199042.5Structurally deficientFairGoodGood50