+42.44936, -97.01552
42°26'58" N, 97°00'56" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:C002610120
Location:1S US20 CEDAR CL
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:28.9 ft. [8.8 m]
Total length:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:16.1 ft. [4.9 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1937
Year reconstructed:1989
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Corrugated Steel [6]
Wearing surface:Other [9]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:5 [as of 2003]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Countermeasures have been installed to mitigate an existing problem with scour. [7]
Operating rating:15.0 tons [13.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:9.0 tons [8.2 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:21.4
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
November 201521.4Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySerious5
November 201321.4Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySerious5
November 201221.5Structurally deficientFairSatisfactorySerious5
November 201021.5Structurally deficientFairGoodSerious5
September 200821.5Structurally deficientFairGoodSerious5
October 200632.3Structurally deficientFairGoodPoor5
October 200432.3Structurally deficientFairGoodPoor5
October 200233.3Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor5
November 200033.3Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor5
November 199833.3Structurally deficientGoodGoodPoor5
November 199633.3Not deficientGoodGoodPoor5
October 199451.5Not deficientGoodGoodPoor5
November 199237.5Not deficientGoodGoodSerious5
December 199137.5Not deficientGoodGoodSerious5