COLL 7698 over E FK MAPLE CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+41.78649, -97.0331941°47'11" N, 97°01'59" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | COLL 7698 over E FK MAPLE CREEK |
| Structure number: | C008424440 |
| Location: | 15S 1.3E OF PILGER |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 75.1 ft. [22.9 m] |
| Total length: | 77.1 ft. [23.5 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 28.5 ft. [8.7 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 2001 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 55 [as of 1998] |
| Deck condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Excellent [9 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 55.4 tons [50.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 32.7 tons [29.7 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 97.6 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $96,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 55 [as of 1999] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 27.7 tons [25.2 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 11.9 tons [10.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 42.8 |
| Recommended work: | Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $96,000 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 55 [as of 1990] |
| Deck condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Scour calculation/evaluation has not been made. [6] |
| Operating rating: | 27.8 tons [25.3 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 12.4 tons [11.3 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 57.9 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $94,000 |