Share:

N12 over LIME CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+42.69101, -97.00266
42°41'28" N, 97°00'10" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:N12 over LIME CREEK
Structure number:S012 21579
Location:1.5W MASKELL
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Rural) [06]
Length of largest span:42.0 ft. [12.8 m]
Total length:127.0 ft. [38.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:36.1 ft. [11.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:38.4 ft. [11.7 m]
Skew angle:10°
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1963
Year reconstructed:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Epoxy Overlay [5]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,225 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:72.8 tons [66.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:42.9 tons [39.0 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:96.2

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
September 201496.2Not deficientGoodGoodGood1225
September 201299.6Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good1285
September 201099.7Not deficientVery GoodGoodVery Good975
September 200899.7Not deficientVery GoodGoodVery Good975
September 200699.7Not deficientVery GoodGoodVery Good965
March 200499.7Not deficientVery GoodGoodVery Good955
September 200299.8Not deficientVery GoodGoodVery Good610
February 200099.8Not deficientVery GoodGoodVery Good575
March 199899.8Not deficientVery GoodGoodVery Good575
March 199697.8Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good620
March 199494.8Not deficientFairGoodGood570
March 199295.9Not deficientFairGoodGood400
March 199096.9Not deficientSatisfactoryGoodGood400