US275/N92 over BNSF/ST/MO R 074-670-W


+41.21142, -95.92745
41°12'41" N, 95°55'39" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:US275/N92 over BNSF/ST/MO R 074-670-W
Structure number:S275 19041
Location:ECL OMAHA
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway, waterway, and railroad
Route classification:Other Principal Arterial (Urban) [14]
Length of largest span:624.0 ft. [190.2 m]
Total length:4300.1 ft. [1310.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:74.2 ft. [22.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:87.9 ft. [26.8 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:2010
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:9,265 [as of 2011]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Underclearances appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:59.8 tons [54.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:36.0 tons [32.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:71.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201571.0Not deficientGoodGoodGood9265
September 201371.0Not deficientVery GoodGoodGood9265
March 201380.1Not deficientGoodGoodGood9265
September 201087.2Not deficientVery GoodExcellentVery Good6945
September 20082.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor7690
October 20072.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor6550
July 20062.0Structurally deficientPoorPoorPoor6550
December 200542.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory8575
July 200142.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory8800
July 200042.2Functionally obsoleteFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10600
June 199842.2Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10600
May 199754.6Not deficientFairSatisfactorySatisfactory7750
August 199553.8Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory7750
July 199364.3Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory6660
July 199260.2Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good5635
July 199157.2Not deficientSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory5635