Q ST/FAU 5026 over W BR PAPILLION CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+41.20517, -96.1249541°12'19" N, 96°07'30" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory (1992, 2000, 2010 editions)
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.
Facts
| Name: | Q ST/FAU 5026 over W BR PAPILLION CREEK |
| Structure number: | U182502820 |
| Location: | OMAHA Q @ 136TH |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 88.9 ft. [27.1 m] |
| Total length: | 227.0 ft. [69.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 63.7 ft. [19.4 m] |
| Skew angle: | 45° |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1980 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
| Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
2010 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 29,050 [as of 2006] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 70.3 tons [63.9 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 41.6 tons [37.8 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 75.7 |
| Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $1,000 |
2000 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 24,400 [as of 1998] |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | There are no noticeable or noteworthy deficiencies which affect the condition of the channel. [9] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 25.7 tons [23.4 metric tons] |
| Evaluation: | Functionally obsolete [2] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 66.0 |
1992 Inspection
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 22,200 [as of 1990] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Operating rating: | 61.4 tons [55.8 metric tons] |
| Inventory rating: | 35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 78.8 |