Share:

CASS ST/FAU 5060 over LITTLE PAPILLION CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+41.26330, -96.03689
41°15'48" N, 96°02'13" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CASS ST/FAU 5060 over LITTLE PAPILLION CREEK
Structure number:U182512025
Location:OMAHA CASS @ 78TH
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Total length:142.1 ft. [43.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:71.9 ft. [21.9 m]
Skew angle:29°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1968
Year reconstructed:2007
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Low slump Concrete [4]

Latest Available Inspection: March 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:20,500 [as of 2010]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:In place and functioning [2]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:31.9 tons [29.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:18.9 tons [17.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:62.7
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
March 201562.7Not deficientGoodGoodGood20500
March 201371.8Not deficientGoodVery GoodGood20500
March 201173.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood23500
May 200972.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood25300
November 200790.0Not deficientExcellentExcellentVery Good25300
July 200655.4Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryPoor22400
October 200471.8Structurally deficientPoorSatisfactoryFair27200
October 200284.9Not deficientFairGoodSatisfactory32300
September 200086.5Not deficientFairGoodGood22000
June 199886.5Not deficientFairGoodGood22000
May 199692.4Not deficientFairGoodGood18400
September 199493.2Not deficientFairGoodGood18575
March 199293.1Not deficientFairGoodGood19400
August 199093.1Not deficientFairGoodGood19400