Share:

120TH ST/FAU 5009 over STREAM

Map 

Coordinates:
+41.28896, -96.10067
41°17'20" N, 96°06'02" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:120TH ST/FAU 5009 over STREAM
Structure number:U182513910
Location:.25S 120TH & W MAPLE RD
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:38.1 ft. [11.6 m]
Total length:115.2 ft. [35.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:45.9 ft. [14.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:59.4 ft. [18.1 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1982
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2014 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:21,510 [as of 2010]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:68.9 tons [62.6 metric tons]
Inventory rating:37.0 tons [33.6 metric tons]
Evaluation:Functionally obsolete [2]
Sufficiency rating:66.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201466.0Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood21510
April 201277.1Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood21510
April 201074.7Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood23900
April 200874.8Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood23100
June 200674.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood22500
June 200475.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryVery GoodGood22200
October 200274.7Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood24000
August 200074.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood23100
September 199874.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood23100
July 199674.9Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood22450
September 199475.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodGood16600
December 199277.8Functionally obsoleteGoodVery GoodVery Good16600