Q ST/FAU 5026 over 25TH ST/UPRR 817-396-R


+41.20561, -95.95199
41°12'20" N, 95°57'07" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Name:Q ST/FAU 5026 over 25TH ST/UPRR 817-396-R
Structure number:U182522840
Location:OMAHA Q @ 26TH
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over highway and railroad
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Total length:854.0 ft. [260.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:47.9 ft. [14.6 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:60.0 ft. [18.3 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1950
Year reconstructed:1979
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Number of main spans:11
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Latex Concrete or similar additive [3]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2015 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:19,800 [as of 2010]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Underclearances appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:16.0 tons [14.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:12.0 tons [10.9 metric tons]
Evaluation:Structurally deficient [1]
Sufficiency rating:5.0
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
August 20155.0Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor19800
November 20145.0Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor19800
September 201321.2Structurally deficientFairPoorPoor19800
August 201220.9Structurally deficientFairFairPoor19800
August 201120.9Structurally deficientFairFairPoor24000
August 200920.9Structurally deficientFairFairPoor24000
September 200722.5Structurally deficientFairFairPoor24000
September 200539.7Functionally obsoleteFairFairFair26500
September 200341.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory26500
October 200142.1Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory24500
August 199949.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory22700
October 199763.9Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory21000
October 199564.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory11400
September 199364.6Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory11300
July 199160.3Functionally obsoleteGoodFairSatisfactory21900