Share:

I ST/FAU 5028 over HELL CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+41.21619, -96.10017
41°12'58" N, 96°06'01" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:I ST/FAU 5028 over HELL CREEK
Structure number:U1825C2605
Location:OMAHA I @ 120TH
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Total length:86.0 ft. [26.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:85.0 ft. [25.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:87.3 ft. [26.6 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1981
Year reconstructed:2010
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2015 

Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:15,260 [as of 2012]
Truck traffic:5% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Superior to present desirable criteria [9]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:61.8 tons [56.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:37.0 tons [33.6 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:88.6
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
April 201588.6Not deficientGoodGoodGood15260
April 201393.3Not deficientGoodGoodGood9000
March 201199.2Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good9000
April 201098.8Not deficientGoodGoodVery Good13200
April 200878.4Functionally obsoleteVery GoodGoodVery Good13200
March 200678.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16450
April 200478.0Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood16600
July 200277.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood17700
September 200077.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood17500
May 199877.9Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood17500
April 199678.2Functionally obsoleteGoodGoodGood14700
October 199480.7Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood13400
March 199281.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood11200
September 199081.0Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodGood11200