+41.27440, -96.08559
41°16'28" N, 96°05'08" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:U1825D1825
Location:111TH ST @ CHARLES ST
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Total length:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.6 ft. [7.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.6 ft. [7.8 m]
Owner:Private (other than railroad) [26]
Year built:1987
Year reconstructed:2010
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Girder and floorbeam system [03]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2014 

Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:200 [as of 2003]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:12.0 tons [10.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:9.0 tons [8.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:48.9
Recommended work:Widening of existing bridge with deck rehabilitation or replacement. [34]

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. ratingEvaluationDeckSuper.Sub.ADT
June 201448.9Not deficientVery GoodVery GoodVery Good200
June 201249.0Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good200
June 201149.0Not deficientExcellentVery GoodVery Good200
March 201028.9Structurally deficientPoorPoorSatisfactory200
October 200838.0Functionally obsoleteFairFairSatisfactory200
May 200639.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactoryFairSatisfactory200
June 200449.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory200
May 200249.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood200
July 200049.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood200
June 199849.0Functionally obsoleteSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood200
September 199649.0Functionally obsoleteGoodSatisfactoryGood200
October 199451.5Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood200
June 199251.5Not deficientGoodSatisfactoryGood200
July 199051.5Not deficientExcellentExcellentExcellent200